كلية الاداب
Permanent URI for this communityhttps://repository.neelain.edu.sd/handle/123456789/484
Browse
Item أخلاقيات الانجاب الاصطناعي(200) طارق حسن عثمانItem نظرية القياس فى الفكر اﻹسلامى(200) محمد سليمان داؤدItem الكتابة الديوانية بمصر في عصر الدولة الايوبية(200) محمد نغشItem الايقاع الشخصى و الايقاع في الشعر المفضل(200) عبد السلام أحمد الشيخItem تفسير سورة لقمان(200) محمد حسن محمد الحسنItem العباب المحيط بمعظم نصوص الشافعي والاصحاب من كتاب الجنايات - كتاب الجهاد(200) عبده محمد أحمد اليمانيItem الفعل اللازم ومايلازمه من حروف الخفض في القران الكريم(200) نعيم احمد نعيم عبدالرحمنItem فلسفة العقوبة في الفقه الاسلامي(200) بابكر بكري حسنABSTRACT This study handled the philosophy ofpunishment in Islamic Jurisprudense (I1 iqh). This parallel in its general sense to the wisdom of the legitimacy of punishment in lslamic Jurisprudence (liiqh). This is based upon the concept" that every legal juresprudense which is not based on a fixed philosophy which has explicit aims and preiciples can not secure any success or servival. The study dealt with the opinions of the famous four doctries; in addition to the (Zahiriya, Shiaa) And (Zaydiya).Thus, the opinions of each of these doctries, in the topic of the study were deliberated , together with favouring the opinion thought to be concurrent with the general principles of Islamic Jurisprudence (Fiqh). The study started with delving into the originality of the philosophical and thought in Islamic lt confirmed the originality of these streams of thought. Thus, prooks were provided which may confirm this and reply to all the ideas which hold that the Arab and Islamic mind is not capable for philosophicalinnovation. Likewise, it is reply to the allegation that the Islamic “Shariaa” is nothing but the Roman Law , in an Arab dress. Then, the study dealt with the interpretation of crime and its relations with morals, the importance of the study ofthe crime theory in Islamic Jurisprudense (Fiqh), the stand of the lslamic Shariaa vis- a- vis this theory. Research and analysis also covered the considered interests which are protected by the lslamic “Shariaa”, the basic characteristics of the Islamic punishment and the purposes of punishment in Shariaa on the pretext that this system is an integral part of the religion, and which is concurrent with the nature of human life. The system also achieves the legal stability for the society because its punishments are devoid of the idea of vengeance. lt also aspires to achieve the beneficial, morale and personal objectives of punishment. After this, the study delved into the punishments in Islamic Jurisprudence. This covered the procedures of “lludoud” their terms, corners, punishments and the philosophical privciples on which punishments are based. This was followed by treating the “Qases” punishment (which bears within it self the origins of life), “Qasas” terms, comers, the method of its application and annulment. This was naturally followed by the study of “Dia” its history, terms, amount, the method of its assessment, the person liable for it and the method ofits payment. The study also delred into the “Tazeer” punishments which essentially left the matter to the responsible persons, by the word of the Islamic “ Shariaa” to determine the type of crime and punishment, in pursuit of the general priciples of “Hudoud” , “Qasas” and “Dia” in accordance with the two sources of Islamic Law (i.e the holy book and the traditions (Sunna) of the Prophet (PPBUH). In this realm, thelimitsofdelegationofautI1orities,tlle powers of the responsible persons in determining criminal acts and punishments, the possibility of their implementation, the method and who implements them are also discussed . The findings of the study provide_that the Islamic legal philosophical thought is original. It is also proved that the Islamic “Shaaia” punishments tend to honour humanity. They also aim at establishing a free and stable life. So, the allegation of their being contrary to human rights — or others criticism from non — muslims, aim at the destruction of the image of “Shariaa”. The same situation applies to the half -educated or the pretenders of being “ ulema” who desparately try to influence the commoners‘ and those with weak minds and weak belief. Yet, the Islamic “Shariaa” despite all this , will remain valid and suitable for every time and place, by the will of God.Item الجماعات الاسلامية في اليمن واتجاهاتها العقدية والفكرية عرضا وتقويما(200) علي صالح محسن صالح ابو صالحItem منهج الامام الشاطبي في منظومته حرز الاماني ووجه التهاني(200) مصطفي محمد محمود الشنقيطيItem الامامة فى الفرق الاسلامية حتي القرن الثالث الهجري(200) حمدي إبراهيم عبد اللهItem الرؤيا الجمالية في العمل التشكيلي(200) المعز عبد الباقي العجيميItem الاختلاف بين القراء العشرة في الاعراب عن طريق الشاطبية والدرة في القران الكريم من الفاتحة الى الناس(200) مالك محمد أحمد القدالItem القيود الشرعية الكلية في المعاملات المالية(200) محمد الحسن جعفر حسنItem العلاج النفسي لدى فلاسفة المسلمين(200) تاج السر حسن احمد عبد الباقيItem فلسفة فيتجشتاين المتأخرة كأساس لنسق منطق المستويا المنعددة(200) وائل أحمد خليل صالحItem الاحكام الشرعية المتعلقة بالزواج والطلاق بدول المغرب العربي(200) عامر محمد مصباح جابرItem فتاوي الامام القفال المروزي(200) احمد حسين الجبوريItem رواية اسحاق عن خلف العاشر من طريق الدرة المضية في الربع الاول من القران الكريم(200) يوسف علي أحمد جابك اللهItem الحدس بين درجة و التصرف الاسلامي(200) المعز عبد الباقى العجيمى