القيادة الإدارية التربوية بالجامعات الأهلية اليمنية بأمانة العاصمة صنعاء (دراسة تحليلية تقويمية)

Abstract

Abstract This thesis aims at achieving the extent of the administrative leadership's performance in the private universities with the tasks undertaken by them and the leadership properties that they enjoy as per the legislation , rules and bylaws organizing tasks . The researcher organized a "questionnaire" composed of two major components as a frame comprised of 4 branch fields that cover (52) administrative , financial and technical and (19) leadership property tasks. In this regard the questionnaire has been applied on a limited quintuple measurement ('1 don’t know — not achieved — weak — intermediate high )of limited marks accordingly ( l, 2, 3, 4, 5 )' conducting adjustments according to the governing remarks , suggestions, and accounting the factors of ( partition — settlement )- which was (0.84) and this result is regarded satisfactory for achieving the goals of this study . Applying the questionnaire on the original population of the study composed of (190) educational leaders in the private universities at the secretariat of the capital Sana’a during the academic year 2003 / 2004 and after sorting out , classifying and describing the data using some central measurements respectively suitable for the data of the study . The main results stated the following :- 1. All the estimations ranged between ( 1.5 — 2.49 ) within the level of estimation ( weak ) except the items relevant to interaction of the principle of reward and punishment among the employees allocating them on suitable accommodation with reasonable fees , preparing the annual balance of the university , granting the sons and daughters of the shareholders scholarships within the financial field in addition to the field of encouraging translation movement in the various fields of knowledge of which it got a low level of estimations reaching less than ( 2.49% ) degree within the estimation level( not achieved ). Perhaps this retums to the nature of the private universities work as investment institutions from one side and absence of the legislation and rules that grant the employees of the private universities the same rights compared to their counterparts in the government universities. 2. There are two standards of achievements for the tasks and properties ranging between ( 3.5 — 4.49 ) degree , ( 7.69% ) for the financial tasks , ( 21.15% ) for technical tasks from the total items of the first field and ( 94.73%) for the leadership properties from the total items of the second field which lies within the estimation level ( intermediate ) whereas other items lie within the estimation level (weak) as follows :- Estimations ranging between ( 2.5 — 3.49 ) degree , ( 26.92% ) for administrative tasks , ( 13.46% ) for financialtasks , ( 21.15% ) for technical tasks from the total number of the items in the first field and ( 5.26% ) for the leadership properties from the total itemsof the second level. 3. There is low level of practices in the administrative and technical tasks and absence of any financial tasks and the estimations ranged between ( 3.5 — 4.49 ) of which resulted in influencing the branch fields within the estimation level (intermediate) as follows : F i|'St : The leadership property occupied the first rank widely at ( 65% ) from the total number of the items within the estimation level ( intermediate ) , followed by the administrative tasks at ( 12.5% ) from the total number of the items within the estimation level ( intermediate ) followed by the technical tasks in the last rank . Second : The results of the triple difference analysis of the design ( 2 X 2 X 3 ) disclosed the influences of changes ( years of experience , type of work , nature of work , interaction with them ) and bilateral difference analysis of the design ( 2 X 3 ) of the influences of the changes on ( specialization , qualification , interaction between them ) on the estimations ( governing ) the population society upon the indication level ( 0! = 0.05) as follows : 1. There are no differences in the indications of the statistic estimations of the population study for the influences of the changes ( years of experience , type of work, nature of work, interaction between them ) . 2. There are differences in the indications of the statistic estimations of the population study for the influences of the changes of the type of work ( leadership / teaching) in favor of the leaders . The study resulted in a numberof recommendations to improve the educational administrative efficiencies with the educational administrative leaderships in the private universities of which are :- 1. Taking into consideration the laws , legislation , bylaws that organize the government and private universities , interacting them because they are the comerstone for the concemed bodies in the process of follow up , supervision , reform , development and modernization of the higher education in Yemen . 2. Concentrating on the importance of combining the administrative, financial and technical tasks with the policies and strategies approved to develop higher education , improving its efficiencies and effectiveness towards achieving a balance in the nature of the technical , financial and administrative tasks in the private universities. 3. Codification of educational processes and policies relevant with ( activities , instructions , supervision, follow up , measurement, assessment, and teaching ) selection of administrative leaderships , teaching staff, admission of students in the private universities in the light of a number of specifications, conditions and measurements pursued in this regard in the government universities. 4. The competent authorities are requested to carry out administrative , tinancial and technical reforms for the private universities according to the legislation , rules and bglaws . 5. Preparing training programs for the educational administrative leaderships dufing in-service to acquire administrative, technical efficiencies and effective teaching efficiencies. The main suggestions are : Conducting comparative studies between the private universities and government universities on the local, Arab and international standards to diagnose the reality and benefit from experiences of others in order to Development of policies and strategies of work in the private universities which are in conformity with the tasks and responsibilities in the private universities.